Rethinking Healthcare: Affordable, Accessible, and Effective for All

Why does the U.S. spend more on healthcare than any other developed nation, yet struggle with lower life expectancy, higher costs, and limited access? Despite spending 17.6% of GDP on healthcare, Americans face barriers in accessing care, dealing with astronomical bills, and experiencing poor health outcomes. With inefficiencies built into the system, millions of people are left navigating a fragmented system, often receiving care that is reactive rather than preventative. What needs to change?

‍

The U.S. System: A History of Fragmentation and Corporate Interests

‍

The U.S. healthcare system didn’t develop overnight—it was shaped by decades of policy decisions that favored corporate interests over public health. Initially designed to address illness rather than prevention, it incentivized the treatment of symptoms instead of addressing root causes. In the 1960s, the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid aimed to provide safety nets, but these programs were never integrated effectively into the broader healthcare system. As private insurance delivered through employment grew, it quickly became the dominant force, pushing policies that prioritized profits over people’s well-being.

‍

Today, the result is a fragmented system that incentivizes illness treatment rather than health, where pharmaceutical companies, insurance providers, and healthcare organizations often compete with each other for profit advantage rather than working together to improve public health.

‍

We are stating the obvious here, but there has to be a better way, and often, finding solutions can be looking at how others are approaching the issue and seeing what might be working for, and, in turn, what we can learn from them. 

‍

Global Lessons: Successes and Shortcomings Abroad

‍

Looking to other countries for inspiration offers valuable lessons on how the U.S. can improve its healthcare system. While no system is perfect, countries like Germany and Singapore have managed to provide better health outcomes at a fraction of the cost the U.S. spends.

‍

Germany, for instance, spends only 11.7% of its GDP on healthcare but has managed to implement a universal healthcare system that combines public and private insurance options. The key to their success? A strong emphasis on prevention—from free health screenings to proactive public health campaigns, Germany prioritizes catching health issues early, often before they escalate into costly chronic conditions. However, Germany faces challenges with the complexity of its multi-payer system, and administrative burdens can sometimes reduce the efficiency of its model.

‍

Similarly, Singapore operates one of the most efficient systems globally, spending just 4% of its GDP on healthcare. Its system uses a mix of government-provided catastrophic care and individual savings accounts to cover day-to-day expenses. This creates a balance of personal responsibility and public support, promoting healthy lifestyles and incentivizing individuals to take charge of their health. However, this system has been critiqued for placing a disproportionate burden on lower-income individuals, who may struggle to contribute to the savings accounts required for health coverage.

‍

These countries show that with the right balance of prevention, competition, and equitable access, better outcomes can be achieved, even with a smaller percentage of GDP allocated to healthcare.

‍

How the U.S. Can Build a Better System

‍

It would be impractical to overhaul the U.S. system in the short term, but we can there is room for reform that would focus on prevention, cost control, and more equitable access to care. This could start with expanding preventive care initiatives that target the underlying causes of chronic diseases. Addressing lifestyle factors like diet, exercise, and mental health could go a long way toward reducing long-term healthcare costs.

‍

Providing more comprehensive public health campaigns and funding for nutrition education, along with access to healthy foods, would give Americans the tools to lead healthier lives, reducing the future burden on the healthcare system. Access to care should also be expanded, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Supporting telemedicine initiatives and offering mobile health clinics could help bring care to these communities, ensuring that all Americans can access the necessary services without unnecessary barriers.

‍

Cost control is another critical area. Allowing Medicare to negotiate all drug prices, for example, could lower the cost of prescriptions for millions of people without crippling BigPharma. Enforcing stronger antitrust regulations to prevent the consolidation of healthcare providers would restore competition, drive prices down, and improve the quality of care. Focusing on prevention and better coordination of care can clearly reduce overall costs and improve health outcomes.

‍

Looking Ahead: The Opportunity for Reform

‍

The U.S. healthcare system is in dire need of change, but it doesn’t have to reinvent the wheel. By looking at what’s working in countries like Germany and Singapore and focusing on reforms that prioritize prevention, equity, and competition, we can begin to build a system that truly works for everyone.

‍

The time for change is now. But it’s not just about coming up with solutions—it’s about deciding, as a nation, to take action. Even if we disagree on what that action might be right now, let's have the conversation. The question isn’t whether we can reform healthcare but whether we are willing to put our differences aside, to take one step forward, for the sake of our common good.

‍

The examples we shared in this article are just some of the ways we could improve the healthcare system. We want to hear from you—your ideas, your experiences, and your thoughts on how we can build a better system. Visit our engagement page to explore others’ opinions, share your own, and join the conversation. Together, we can help shape a healthier future for all.

‍